When a mortgage falls behind and the lender starts the legal process to take back a house, a foreclosure attorney is the person who steps in to slow things down, negotiate, or fight the case in court. In Indianapolis, that work covers judicial foreclosure defense (Indiana requires foreclosures to go through the courts), loss mitigation talks with the lender or servicer, loan modification and forbearance applications, bankruptcy filings when they're used to stop a sale, short sale and deed-in-lieu negotiations, and representing homeowners at the mandatory settlement conferences Indiana courts often order before a case can move forward. Some of these 97 listings also represent lenders and investors on the other side of these cases, so it's worth confirming which side an attorney typically works before you call.
A few things separate a lawyer worth hiring from one that just takes your money and files paperwork. Ask how many Marion County (or your specific county) foreclosure cases they've actually handled, since local judges and court procedures vary. Ask what their fee structure looks like: flat fee, hourly, or a mix, and get it in writing before signing anything. Find out how fast they respond once a case is filed, because foreclosure timelines move on the court's schedule, not yours, and missed deadlines can cost you options like a settlement conference or a modification review. And ask directly what outcomes they've gotten for people in situations similar to yours, whether that's a loan modification, a dismissed case, extra time to sell, or a negotiated exit.
Our scores weigh things like responsiveness, verified client outcomes, experience with local courts, and complaint history, so you're not stuck guessing off a five-star average alone. For the short list of attorneys who score best on those measures, see the ranked guide to Indianapolis foreclosure attorneys. Curious how we calculate the scores themselves? That's laid out on our methodology page.
Get matched with legal services in Indianapolis
Free and no obligation. Tell us what you need, and we'll connect you with suitable attorneys in your area.
We found 97 businesses offering legal services in Indianapolis; 42 met the criteria for the scored directory. The order weighs each business's overall score by how much of its reviewed work is legal services, so a lower-scored specialist can rank above a higher-scored generalist.
Reviewers consistently report feeling supported through stressful legal matters, with staff keeping them informed at every stage and ensuring they understand what is happening. Phil, Zach, Gabby, Laura, Keith, and Diana stand out for their responsiveness and the firm's ability to secure fair settlements where clients expected little or nothing.
Clients consistently describe Walton Legal as thorough, respectful, and easy to work with. Attorney Carrie Breedlove and paralegal Margaret stand out for treating people with patience and dignity while handling complex cases. Staff explain steps in plain English, answer questions quickly, and follow through on filings. Reviewers often note relief and peace of mind after finishing their bankruptcy or debt cases. The firm serves individuals filing Chapter 7 or 13 bankruptcy, fighting debt collection, and seeking garnishment defense. They cite speediness in processing (one client discharged within three months of filing). Many reviewers mention low fees as a plus, and the team's non-judgmental approach appears especially valued by clients who feel shame about their financial situation.
Workers' comp clients consistently praise Dan Quigley for cutting through insurance company delays and simplifying a stressful process. He answers calls reliably, negotiates strong settlements even when initial offers fall far short, and treats injured workers with genuine respect during their most vulnerable moments. Quigley handles workplace injury claims across amputation, spinal cord injuries, head injuries, and shoulder damage, among others. Clients report settlements delivered within months, not years. His calm demeanor and plain-English explanations earned him trust from families facing financial crisis after work accidents.
Hayes Law Office stands out for giving straight talk instead of fear tactics. Attorney Philip Hayes explains charge mechanics and realistic outcomes, then works the case methodically. Reviewers repeatedly describe getting charges dismissed when other lawyers said prison time was inevitable, coupled with staff who stay in touch at every step and answer questions on the first call. His flat fees undercut comparable firms by 20-30%. Named staff Jean Philippe also drew praise for responsiveness. Clients report two-month case closures and say the stress of not knowing what happens next vanishes fast. No complaints surface in the record.
Banks & Brower stands out for repeat clients naming specific attorneys-Joshua Zaucha, Kyle Noffsinger, Adam Brower, Dallin Lykins, Brendan, Sam, Joe Wykoff, Mark Busby, Romy Elswerky, and Brad Banks-each praised for keeping people informed and easing stress through difficult cases. Whether navigating family law, immigration, criminal defense, or injury claims, reviewers consistently report being contacted quickly, never feeling rushed, and walking away confident the firm genuinely prioritized their outcome over speed. The firm's size (865 reviews, 4.9-star average) and named paralegal support (Kendra mentioned alongside Joshua Zaucha) suggest established systems for follow-up and care. No reviewers complained about delays, fees, or broken promises; those who waited longer than expected still felt heard when they reconnected. The breadth of legal areas served (criminal, family, immigration, personal injury) draws clients across Indianapolis, Carmel, Fishers, and Marion County.
Get matched with legal services in Indianapolis
Free and no obligation. Tell us what you need, and we'll connect you with suitable attorneys in your area.
Mark Zuckerberg's office fields calls from across Indiana with same-day callbacks and answers all questions upfront, making it clear what happens next. His paralegal Peyton Rabuck guides clients step-by-step through Chapter 7, Chapter 13, and foreclosure cases, turning a painful process into something clients describe as organized, smooth, and manageable; the entire team (Mark, Peyton, and staff like Corey) stays available and patient throughout. One client worked with the firm for seven years across multiple bankruptcy filings and praised the consistency. Another reported paying less than local competitors. Clients highlight honesty, professionalism, and genuine care as what sets the experience apart from a transactional filing.
Cane Legal earns consistent praise for Attorney Nakeina Cane's knowledge, responsiveness, and genuine care during sensitive matters like divorce and estate planning. Clients describe feeling heard and supported through complex processes. Two isolated complaints mention receptionist-level scheduling problems and missed callbacks, but these stand apart from the overwhelming positive feedback on legal work itself. Staff named include Attorney Cane, Paralegal Aaliyah and Aalilhea, Attorney Woodland, and Mrs. Raker. Reviewers highlight willingness to meet clients at home, adapt to disability needs, and explain every step clearly, making stressful legal situations feel more manageable.
People consistently return to Merry Fountain and her team for accident claims because they answer fast, explain everything clearly, and fight hard to get larger settlements. She handles cases with genuine care, stays in contact throughout, and makes the legal process feel manageable rather than stressful. Reviewers note her responsiveness via email and phone, her ability to navigate complex situations (appeals, insurance disputes, liability reversals), and her willingness to keep pushing for better offers when insurance companies lowball. Her team is described as kind and trustworthy. No complaints appear in recent reviews.
Clients consistently report that Matt Conrad delivers thorough, understandable legal guidance with genuine empathy. His availability, direct communication, and ability to simplify complex bankruptcy processes earned him particular praise for making a stressful decision feel manageable and stress-free. The office maintains a professional atmosphere (downtown view, validated parking) and Conrad's team coordinates filings promptly. Reviewers note he takes time to explore all options, including referrals when cases fall outside his expertise, and charges reasonable rates for financial legal work.
Dillman & Owen consistently helps families navigate elder care and estate planning with patience and real expertise. Named staff like Lyndsay, Edna, Haiden, and Sadiyah earned repeated praise for thorough work, clear communication, and a genuine willingness to ease stressful decisions. Clients describe the firm as going beyond paperwork to act as steady guides through Medicaid, guardianship, trusts, and long-term care placement. The firm's strength lies in treating families as valued partners rather than cases. They explain legal steps in plain language, answer questions fully, and remain available throughout the process. A client who worked with them over four years summed it up: the firm combines deep expertise with compassion and "fierce advocacy when it matters most." Parents and adult children alike come back, suggesting a track record of outcomes that hold up over time.
David Frangos and his team earn consistent praise for rapid callbacks, transparent fees, and calm guidance through complex cases-from probate after loss to multi-year litigation. One serious complaint alleges hidden charges and months of stalled progress; a veteran noted scheduling delays tied to legal insurance but later respected the firm's direct response. Overall, the firm stands out for responsiveness and making difficult legal work feel manageable.
Most clients praise Sawin & Shea for clear communication, responsive staff, and straightforward handling of bankruptcy and debt cases. Attorney Tom Irons and team members Tammie, Bridget, and Mia are named for their professionalism and patience. A small minority report payment plan concerns and felt mishandled during Chapter 13 proceedings.
Reviewers consistently credit Stacey Burkhard and the Jackson & Oglesby team with guiding them through Chapter 13 and Chapter 7 bankruptcies with patience, clarity, and responsiveness. Clients report the firm made confusing processes feel manageable, answered endless questions without hesitation, and resolved lingering issues like wage garnishment well after filing. The repeated praise for affordability and speed, paired with attorney Mike Jackson's involvement in longer cases, suggests the firm delivers both personal attention and practical results.
Clients consistently report rapid results on expungements and criminal matters, often within weeks to months. Christina Gomez and Jeff Cardella stand out for combining speed with genuine care: one reviewer spent 30 years waiting for rights restoration and found relief here; another who feared a failed background check had their entire record cleared. Staff go beyond expectations, including weekend calls from court prep. Two dissenting reviews flag a hang-up from office staff and selective case acceptance. The firm's reputation rests on expungement expertise and criminal defense across shoplifting, drug charges, domestic violence, and federal cases. Reviewers emphasize being heard and treated as individuals, not case numbers. Speed matters here: one expungement closed in under 30 days, another felony early expungement defied other lawyers' "impossible" verdicts. This is not a high-volume mill.
Kevin Karimi and Ron Gemma deliver thorough criminal defense work with remarkable responsiveness. Clients consistently praise their willingness to explain the process plainly, answer late-night calls, and fight hard for outcomes. Kevin's team secured case dismissals, probation instead of prison time, and record expungements. Amanda, their paralegal, earned repeated mention for tireless follow-up and making clients feel genuinely valued rather than rushed through intake. The firm claims 25 years combined experience and serves Indianapolis and the metro. A small fraction of recent reviews flag refusals based on client personality, high retainers ($30,000 requested in one case), and one case of missed court dates. Most pricing praise centers on willingness to negotiate payment plans, though affordability claims in their advertising may overpromise to disabled clients on fixed income.
Clients consistently experience confident, prepared representation backed by attorneys who take personal interest in their outcomes. Named attorneys (Yasmin Abdelhak Barker, Christopher Eskew, Ben Jaffee, Heather Franklin) and staff earn praise for explaining legal strategy, handling custody and family cases swiftly, and delivering courtroom wins; one negative review flags intake staff for unresponsiveness and unclear case-determination processes. Their website lists criminal defense expertise (DUI, drug, assault, fraud, expungement), though recent reviews focus on family law and criminal outcomes. Service areas span Indianapolis to Fort Wayne. The firm claims over 75 years combined experience.
This firm draws strong praise for its responsiveness, named attorneys like Jeff Hammond, Greg Laker, Amanda, and Skyler who clients describe as knowledgeable and genuinely invested in their cases. Staff keep clients updated consistently, explain legal matters clearly, and handle emotional situations with care. One complainant reported poor communication and unresolved issues, noting plans to escalate to the State Bar, but this represents a stark minority against overwhelming five-star reviews praising settlement outcomes, court victories, and thorough case management. The firm lists personal injury, medical malpractice, wrongful death, car and truck accidents, premises liability, and sexual abuse cases on its website. Clients specifically named Jeff Hammond, Greg Laker, Greg, Amanda, Skyler, Chad, Tara, Brett B. Thomas, and others. Reviewers highlight quick settlements, closure without courtroom appearances, support through traumatic cases, and follow-up care like holiday cards. The firm operates in Mile Square, Indianapolis.
Reviewers describe a firm where staff handle questions with patience and clarity, especially paralegal Stacey Burkhard, who answers detailed inquiries and solves issues fast. Attorneys like Dana and Mike guide clients through bankruptcy and debt relief in ways that ease the emotional weight of financial crisis, though one reviewer noted a missed appearance at an initial meeting that was later resolved.
Reviews are limited, but the one available reflects strong satisfaction. The team earned client gratitude for their work on what appears to be an injury case.
Harry Bradley and his team earn consistent praise for turning auto defect disputes into clear wins. Clients emphasize his willingness to spend time upfront, his plain-English walk-throughs of lemon law timelines, and his follow-up throughout months of negotiation with manufacturers. Where other firms pushed fast contracts with minimal explanation, reviewers felt genuinely heard here. Settlements routinely exceeded expectations, and the staff answered calls the same day. This is a specialized lemon law practice that handles vehicle repurchase cases across multiple states, with Harry and Adam named repeatedly as the core team.
Most clients praise Christie Bell & Marshall for experienced attorneys who explain every step and fight hard for settlements. Staff like Tina Bell and Kyle Christie appear frequently in positive reviews. Two one-star reviews allege bias in case selection and a focus on larger cases over individual clients, though the overwhelming majority report successful outcomes and genuine rapport.
Get matched with legal services in Indianapolis
Free and no obligation. Tell us what you need, and we'll connect you with suitable attorneys in your area.
Most clients praise Jason Cleveland, Thaddeus Keefer, and Chris Cassidy for sharp legal work, responsiveness, and clear guidance on employment and workplace disputes. However, a handful report significant delays in follow-up after initial intake calls and frustration with settlement pressure, suggesting inconsistency in case handling or client communication systems.
Every review praises Jayson Gilbert and his team for honest advice, genuine care for clients, and making complex legal work feel manageable. Staff know estate planning, probate, Medicaid rules well and take time to educate clients before decisions are made.
Gloyeski's staff, especially Alexa, Lexi, and Brittany, earn consistent praise for patience and genuine care during bankruptcy filings. Many clients describe feeling welcomed and relieved after their cases closed. One review raises concerns about the principal owner's communication style, though this remains an outlier in the overall record.
Gary Colasessano earns consistent praise for criminal defense work, with clients describing him as attentive, knowledgeable, and driven by genuine care rather than profit. He calls back quickly, explains strategy clearly, and negotiates deals that spare clients from year-long probation, heavy fines, or court appearances. His rates are described as fair compared to competitors. A handful of complaints surface: one client reports Gary admitted seeing bodycam footage but never mailed it as promised; another says staff hung up when asked about Spanish-language services; a third mentioned rude receptionists. Most clients credit Gary directly with excellent outcomes and describe feeling protected and informed throughout proceedings.
Most clients praise HKM's attorneys, especially Ben Ellis and Katie Bensberg, for taking time to explain cases thoroughly, responding promptly, and achieving positive outcomes. A small number report frustration with slow intake processes, missing call records, and difficulty reaching the firm initially.
All 16 recent reviews are five-star, praising Marty Barnes and Jeff Cadwell for clarity, patience, and genuine care during probate, estate planning, and contract review. Reviewers consistently note that complex legal matters felt manageable and transparent, with both attorneys available and responsive to questions.
Arlene Kline earns strong reviews for probate and estate work, with clients consistently praising her knowledge, honesty, and willingness to explain complex matters clearly. Two older reviews flag communication lapses, but the recent pattern (including a five-star review from a month ago) shows consistent attentiveness and reasonable fees that set her apart in estate planning and administration.
Curlin & Clay earns strong ratings for family law work, particularly custody and child support cases. Clients often praise Attorney Curlin and paralegal Angela Kee for explaining complex processes, listening without judgment, and standing up for parents overlooked by the system. The firm shines when attorneys stay engaged: weekly check-ins, clear strategy at each court stage, and respect for fathers seeking custody rights have left many clients grateful. Behind that reputation sits an inconsistency problem. Three recent one-star reviews cite dropped communication after retainer, unreturned calls, fee discrepancies between intake and initial consultation, and billing for unfinished work. A disabled mother in crisis reported ghosting and refused refund after her case was abandoned mid-stream. For stable, collaborative cases with clear timelines, the firm excels. Those facing urgent or crisis situations may find the firm either deeply invested or hard to reach, depending on when they call.
All eight reviews are five-star. Reviewers praise Clark Giles, Sharon Cruz, Jordan Gleason, and David Snider for real estate expertise, rapid responses, and careful attention to detail on matters ranging from property transactions to liability releases.
Indianapolis Legal Aid Society draws sharply divided reviews. Some clients praise welcoming receptionists and successful referrals to specialists. Others report rude phone staff, unresponsiveness, and weak case advocacy, particularly in custody and contempt matters. As a 501(c)(3), the organization focuses on family law but phone access remains inconsistent.
Nine of 11 detailed reviews praise the attorneys for knowledge, responsiveness, and integrity. Matthew Foster stands out for strategic nonprofit guidance; Sean White and Steve earned respect for managing eminent domain and settlements with patience. Two one-star reviews flag a refusal to schedule a paid consultation on eminent domain process and reluctance to release prior case photos when another client (Zuluscape) held conflicting interests.
Strong track record of case wins and client satisfaction. Reviewers consistently praise professionalism and the ability to explain complex legal matters clearly. One older complaint about phone accessibility; current reviews show no such issues.
The firm has a strong track record on criminal and family law cases, with multiple clients praising Mr. Harshman's professionalism and ability to secure dismissals. However, significant complaints center on communication breakdowns (missed consultation calls, unanswered portal messages), front desk rudeness, and clients reporting financial losses due to case handling delays or weak strategy advice. High variability in client experience suggests outcome depends heavily on attorney and case type.
Most reviewers praise Travis Van Winkle's legal knowledge, courtroom composure, and ability to explain complex matters clearly. Several report successful family law outcomes and long-term working relationships spanning years. However, a consistent minority complains about billing irregularities, cash payment disputes, abandoned representation, and difficulty obtaining information without additional fees. Evidence is limited to review text only.
Established real estate attorney with strong praise from long-term clients for expertise in property matters, but recent reviews flag persistent issues with phone responsiveness and fee transparency. Those who reach her praise her work; those who cannot reach her leave frustrated.
Most clients praise Chuck Roach for availability, candid advice, and skill explaining legal concepts to non-experts. One experienced client raised concerns about billing practices and willingness to hand off courtroom work to other firms.
Griffith Xidias splits sharply: clients who connect report skilled work and successful results, with attorney Matt Griffith and staff member Patty earning praise. Others face weeks of silence and unfinished tasks, leaving them feeling abandoned. The firm has operated since 1993 and serves Indianapolis-area clients, but consistency appears uneven.
Three reviewers consistently describe Thomas Rothe as knowledgeable and detail-oriented, with family referrals and repeat clients returning for bankruptcy and consultation work. Limited review data; no negative feedback present.
All seven reviews rate Ryan O'Connell five stars. Clients praise him as hands-on, strategic, and willing to fight for results. One client's case took years; Ryan kept communicating through COVID until the record was cleared. Evidence is thin for foreclosure-specific work.
Large firm attracts strong praise for expertise but faces repeated complaints about slow communication, unresponsive staff, and billing inconsistencies. Time-sensitive matters and small-town clients report particular friction with delays and lack of follow-up.
Reviewers report stark contrasts. Some praise fast, thorough handling of real estate and probate issues and describe the attorney as knowledgeable and professional. Others note unreturned calls, lack of case preparation, and errors on filings. A handful report requesting payment before reviewing documents or understanding the case scope. Limited detail on foreclosure-specific services; most feedback covers real estate transactions, probate, and title disputes. Rating volatility (56% five-star, 33% one-to-two-star) reflects this inconsistency.
Enquiries submitted through our quote and contact forms may be passed to partner providers who can perform the work. We may receive a referral fee for these introductions, but our rankings and scores are determined solely by our published method and are never influenced by referral fees.
Last updated 2026-08-27