Best foreclosure attorneys in Fishers

Why it ranks first

Mario Massillamany, Amy Carson, and their colleagues hold the top composite score on this list at 89.2, built on 240 reviews and a 4.7 rating with a high-confidence read. Clients single out clear communication, genuine care during stressful cases, and results that include successful expungements and family matters. The firm also gets credit for turning down work outside its scope and pointing clients to someone who could actually help.

Pros

• ✓Named attorneys explain options clearly and fight hard for clients
• ✓Paralegals Morgan and Stacy Walls handle follow-up with care
• ✓Track record includes expungements and family law wins
• ✓Honest about referring out work outside their scope

Why it ranks second

Chris Wyant's firm posts a 4.9 rating and an 85.7 composite score, with clients repeatedly noting he takes on personal injury cases that other firms pass on. Reviewers describe thorough settlement research and direct access to Wyant himself throughout the process. The review base is smaller than the top spot's (50 reviews), so the confidence read here is medium rather than high.

Pros

• ✓Accepts cases other firms decline
• ✓Direct communication from Chris Wyant personally
• ✓Thorough preparation and negotiation on settlements
• ✓Handles multi-asset disputes involving vehicles, property, and injury claims

Why it ranks third

Chad Rollins and his team turn around deed drafting, recording, and title updates quickly, with some clients closing transactions in days. The firm earns an 82.1 composite score on a 4.8 rating across 74 reviews, with quick responses and clear explanations coming up again and again. One thing to know going in: this firm works the landlord side of disputes, not the tenant side.

Pros

• ✓Same-day or next-day turnaround on deed recording
• ✓Clear explanations of paperwork and legal steps
• ✓Responsive to follow-up questions
• ✓Efficient, straightforward transaction handling

Why it ranks fourth

David Shircliff brings over 30 years of courtroom experience and a direct, no-nonsense style, with several clients crediting him for dismissals and acquittals they did not expect. He offers payment plans and gives blunt, realistic assessments of a case's chances rather than false optimism. That directness has a flip side: a handful of reviewers say his caseload sometimes left their matter with less attention than they wanted.

Pros

• ✓Over 30 years of active courtroom experience
• ✓Offers payment plans
• ✓Track record of dismissals and acquittals
• ✓Explains legal complexity in plain terms

Why it ranks fifth

Dave Seiter, Russell Cate, and Sundeep Singh draw praise for quick answers and strong courtroom outcomes across 63 reviews and a 4.9 rating. The firm even fields emergency calls after hours, according to reviewers. Two older reviews allege abandoned representation and unexplained fee retention, which is why this firm's confidence rating comes in low despite the strong overall numbers.

Pros

• ✓Named attorneys known for fast response times
• ✓Strong courtroom track record
• ✓Available for after-hours emergencies
• ✓Transparent fee structure, per most reviewers

Why it ranks sixth

Every one of Smid Law's 22 reviews is five stars, with Edward Smid and Emily Kopp singled out for quick responses and clear guidance on everything from lease negotiations to life insurance claims. It is a small enough sample, and skews toward older reviews, that we rate confidence here as low even with the perfect score. Still, the consistency across years of feedback says something.

Pros

• ✓Perfect 5-star rating across all 22 reviews
• ✓Quick response on client communications
• ✓Named attorneys praised for attention to detail
• ✓Handles a range of matters from contracts to insurance disputes

Why it ranks seventh

Julie Camden's team, including Chris Dolinski, Josiah Swinney, and paralegal Dulce Crane, covers family law, real estate, tax, and civil matters, with reviewers noting they take on complicated situations other counsel had already given up on. Nearly 99 reviews back a 4.5 rating, though a slower pace of recent reviews pulls the confidence rating down to low. One recent complaint about unresponsiveness after a paid consultation is worth weighing against the broader record of quick replies and flexible payment terms.

Pros

• ✓Quick response to calls and emails, per most reviewers
• ✓Handles complex, high-stakes cases across several practice areas
• ✓Willing to discuss flexible payment terms
• ✓Deep bench of attorneys and staff

Why it ranks eighth

Hensley posts the highest composite score on this list at 92.3, backed by 670 reviews and a 4.9 rating, the largest and freshest review base of any firm here. Clients single out attorney Briceida Ortega and case manager Melanie Diaz for keeping them updated with quick callbacks and clear, step-by-step explanations. The volume and consistency of the feedback push this into medium confidence territory.

Pros

• ✓Quick response on calls and emails
• ✓Clear, step-by-step case explanations
• ✓Named staff who track case details closely
• ✓Large volume of consistently positive reviews

Why it ranks ninth

Jack Freedman and Joe Bryant earn praise for turning difficult family law situations into workable outcomes, with reviewers citing clear communication and genuine care. The review base is small at 14, and one client described a pricey consultation as dismissive, so treat the 71.3 composite score as a low-confidence signal until more feedback comes in.

Pros

• ✓Deep knowledge of local courts
• ✓Long-term client relationships
• ✓Detailed case preparation
• ✓Transparent about expectations and outcomes

Why it ranks tenth

Brian Campbell is a managing broker and realtor rather than an attorney, which sets this listing apart from the rest of the list, but reviewers highlight his handling of buying, selling, and property management across Indianapolis, including for out-of-state and investor clients. All 21 reviews are five stars, though the lack of recent reviews and verification signal keeps the composite score at 63.6 and confidence low.

Pros

• ✓Deep knowledge of Indianapolis-area neighborhoods and market trends
• ✓Handles sales, purchases, property management, and repairs
• ✓Works with out-of-state and investor clients
• ✓Straightforward, transparent communication

Why it ranks #11

Emerson offers free consultations and earlier reviewers describe a knowledgeable, available team, but the 3.9 rating from 11 reviews reflects a real split: about three-quarters five-star, one-quarter sharply critical. One recent review describes $15,000 paid with minimal results and silence during hearings, alongside another client who rated a free consultation highly. That mix is why this firm sits lower on this list with a low-confidence score.

Pros

• ✓Free consultations offered
• ✓Staff described as personable and knowledgeable
• ✓Available for phone consultations

Why it ranks #12

CCHA has been around since 1880, and five of nine reviewers highlight Sarah Randall and Leslie Henderzahs for clear communication and a comfortable client experience. One negative review from several years back cites unreturned calls, but with only nine reviews total and a rating of 4.0, we rate confidence here as low.

Pros

• ✓Long-established firm dating back to 1880
• ✓Named staff praised for clear communication

Why it ranks #13

All five reviews on record for Matt Boruta are five stars, with clients noting he takes time to understand their situation instead of rushing through it. The review count is small and none are recent, so the 60.3 composite score comes with a low-confidence flag even though the feedback itself is uniformly strong.

Pros

• ✓Takes time to understand each client's situation
• ✓Responsive by phone, email, and text

Why it ranks #14

The one detailed review here describes Matthew Keyes fighting hard on a case, staying in touch throughout, and charging fairly for the work. With just two reviews total and the most recent dating back seven years, there simply is not enough evidence to rate this firm with any confidence, hence the 56.6 composite score near the bottom of this list.

Pros

• ✓Described as hardworking on the one case reviewed
• ✓Kept the client updated throughout

Why it ranks #15

This listing has a single review on record, a 1-star rating, which is not enough to form a reliable read on how this firm handles cases. The 44 composite score reflects that near-total absence of data rather than any documented pattern of bad service. Anyone considering this firm should treat it as an unknown quantity and verify credentials and experience directly before hiring.

Pros

• ✓Listed as a Fishers-area legal contact
• ✓Profile available for direct follow-up and verification