Page 2 of 2: businesses ranked 101-156 of 156. Ranked by score and relevance, start from the top or open the full map view.
One reviewer called Steven J. Halbert "very great," but limited review volume means this profile reflects minimal public feedback.
Shouse & Langlois draws strong praise for Randy Shouse's legal knowledge and courtesy, but several reviewers report difficulty reaching the firm by phone or email. One client felt the attorney's tone was curt when discussing a prenuptial agreement and unwilling to accommodate payment flexibility. Another found debt defense weak, with limited effort to reduce or eliminate the amount owed.
Most clients praise Skimin's availability, bankruptcy expertise, and willingness to work urgent cases like Thanksgiving filings. One reviewer reported repeated unanswered calls and emails. The 4.7 rating reflects mostly strong outcomes, though communication gaps merit caution.
Strong advocates when engaged: Erin and Catherine's team provide emotional support, clear explanations, and thorough attention during cases. But inconsistent follow-up and a pattern of pursuing their own case strategy over client wishes have left some clients waiting for calls that never came and wondering if the firm prioritizes quick wins over long-term outcomes.
Most clients praise Chuck Roach for availability, candid advice, and skill explaining legal concepts to non-experts. One experienced client raised concerns about billing practices and willingness to hand off courtroom work to other firms.
Griffith Xidias splits sharply: clients who connect report skilled work and successful results, with attorney Matt Griffith and staff member Patty earning praise. Others face weeks of silence and unfinished tasks, leaving them feeling abandoned. The firm has operated since 1993 and serves Indianapolis-area clients, but consistency appears uneven.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Allen Lidy is a defense attorney in Greenwood with over a decade of practice and a track record handling serious criminal and civil cases. Most reviewers praise his competence, speed, and directness; one noted slower communication responses.
Mann Law helped some clients resolve legal issues fast and saved money, with staff praised as knowledgeable. Others report poor communication after hire, unclear billing, and needing to chase down status updates repeatedly.
Three reviewers consistently describe Thomas Rothe as knowledgeable and detail-oriented, with family referrals and repeat clients returning for bankruptcy and consultation work. Limited review data; no negative feedback present.
Large firm attracts strong praise for expertise but faces repeated complaints about slow communication, unresponsive staff, and billing inconsistencies. Time-sensitive matters and small-town clients report particular friction with delays and lack of follow-up.
Most clients report a major shift in confidence and reduced stress after working with this firm. Named staff like Tony and Lacey are praised for clarity and follow-up. One early review flagged pressure to share personal details before fees are discussed, though recent reviews do not echo this concern.
All seven reviews rate Ryan O'Connell five stars. Clients praise him as hands-on, strategic, and willing to fight for results. One client's case took years; Ryan kept communicating through COVID until the record was cleared. Evidence is thin for foreclosure-specific work.
Two reviewers found Russell responsive and capable of winning cases. One client paid a $2,500 retainer a year ago but received no updates, no communication, and no work despite repeated attempts to reach him.
A long-time client returned multiple times for legal help and reported good results each time. Review evidence is limited to one detailed account.
One reviewer praised Matthew Keyes for fighting hard on the case, staying in touch, and charging fairly. Evidence is limited to a single five-star review from seven years ago.
One reviewer reported quick and reasonable resolution of their matter. Evidence is limited to a single five-star review.
Strong advocates report winning cases and receiving attentive service, but others describe missed calls, wrong court dates, and dismissive responses to serious errors. Communication reliability appears inconsistent across clients.
Most reviewers praise Smith's responsiveness, knowledge of bankruptcy and debt relief, and ability to ease the stress of financial crisis. Two reviewers reported he was unreachable, missed callbacks, and steered them toward bankruptcy without exploring other options; one accused him of leaving their foreclosure case unmanaged.
One reviewer gave a five-star rating. Review detail is limited, but the business's website shows experience in real estate title work since 1993.
Estate planning clients report strong work from named attorneys like Rebecca Geyer and Nicole Eckert, with plans completed quickly and at fair rates. However, recent complaints focus on unreliable communication: missed confirmation emails, unanswered voicemails, and a 90-day wait for appointments, leaving some clients doubting the firm can handle critical legal matters dependably.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Reviewers highlight Attorney Peter Ten Eyck's ability to untangle complex, years-long legal problems that other lawyers had left unresolved. His direct approach and quick responses earned consistent five-star marks.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Tom Lewis draws strong loyalty from satisfied clients who praise his quick response times, genuine care, and reasonable fees, with many reporting successful outcomes in criminal and family cases. However, a vocal minority report serious lapses: missed communication after hiring, cancelled meetings, showing up unprepared, and unresponsiveness to calls and texts about work promised but not delivered.
Tamara Rogers draws strong praise for estate planning and elder law expertise, with clients noting her responsiveness and ability to explain complex processes. However, inconsistent phone manners and follow-up failures have left some callers frustrated, particularly those seeking initial consultation.
Reviewers report stark contrasts. Some praise fast, thorough handling of real estate and probate issues and describe the attorney as knowledgeable and professional. Others note unreturned calls, lack of case preparation, and errors on filings. A handful report requesting payment before reviewing documents or understanding the case scope. Limited detail on foreclosure-specific services; most feedback covers real estate transactions, probate, and title disputes. Rating volatility (56% five-star, 33% one-to-two-star) reflects this inconsistency.
Aarti Wolenski earns consistent five-star praise for combining thorough case preparation with genuine care. Clients report she explains legal steps clearly, answers questions promptly, and advocates firmly while keeping them informed at every stage.
One reviewer reported being hung up on by an attorney after calling with positive financial news and asking about alternatives to bankruptcy. Review evidence is limited to one clear complaint amid sparse data.
Roxanne Oberley earns consistent five-star reviews for clear explanations, fast action, and treating clients as individuals. Remote-friendly service and transparent pricing matter to repeat clients across multiple legal issues.
Both reviewers praise the attorney for patience, empathy, and willingness to tailor help to individual circumstances. Limited review volume means this positive picture is not yet broadly confirmed, but the feedback is consistent.
R Lee Money Law attracts strongly divided opinion. Long-standing clients praise his direct advice and staff warmth, yet recent reviewers report he does little in court and shows little engagement once cases proceed. One client paid over $25,000 for minimal visible work and felt dismissed; another lost custody partly due to his inaction during trial.
Strong courtroom wins and life-changing case results draw five-star praise; one reviewer credits Neal Ziliak with enabling their return to work, housing, and family. The caveat: some clients report delayed replies and a terse manner when contact finally arrives.
When reachable, Jay Meisenhelder delivers solid legal guidance and real results, especially in employment and civil rights disputes. Several five-star reviews praise his responsiveness, expertise, and ability to ease clients through stressful processes. However, a consistent thread of one-star reviews warns of unanswered messages, missed meetings, and long communication gaps, with some clients reporting he took payment but left them stranded for months.
The firm's website draws praise for its design and interactive features. A single recent one-star review raised serious concerns about bias and staff conduct involving attorney Ellen Townsend, but evidence is limited.
Amanda Whipple earns consistent five-star reviews from repeat clients who praise her quick communication, realistic guidance, and willingness to fight through obstacles.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
All five reviews rate Matt Boruta five stars and highlight his knowledge, responsiveness, and genuine care for clients. Reviewers note he spends time understanding each situation rather than rushing through cases.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Denise Turner's firm wins significant cases: charges dismissed, habitual offender charges dropped, murder charges reduced to lesser felonies, house arrest modifications granted. Clients and former colleagues praise her courtroom skill and tenacity. However, a substantive minority report months of delays before work started, calls going unanswered, cases abandoned mid-process, and retained fees after withdrawal. The firm's responsiveness appears inconsistent between clients and between staff members.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Four Google reviews show a sharp split: half praise the firm's warmth and care, while half report being left in the dark about case progress and having little say in strategy. Evidence is thin, spanning four years, so patterns are hard to confirm.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Review evidence is limited. The business operates in Mile Square, Indianapolis, and their website lists services in eminent domain law, property condemnation, and related real estate matters across central Indiana counties since 1968.
Review evidence is limited. Their website lists bankruptcy, commercial litigation, and personal injury services across Dallas, Fort Worth, Hot Springs, and Indianapolis, with operating history of more than two decades claimed.
Review evidence is too limited to describe this business fairly. Their website lists estate planning, tax work, guardianships, adoption, and business entity services in Greenwood, but no customer reviews are available to assess quality or service experience.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Review evidence is limited for Thompson Legal Services. The business lists worker's compensation, personal injury, medical malpractice, criminal, and family law services on their website, serving the southside of Indianapolis. More detailed ratings and feedback are not available.
Review evidence is too limited to assess this firm's track record. Their website states they handle personal injury, wrongful death, aviation, and railroad worker cases across four states, but no Google reviews are available to verify client experience or outcomes.
Christian Homes operates in the Indianapolis Metro area offering foreclosure help, cash home purchases, forbearance processing, and general contracting services. Review evidence is limited; their website claims 45 years of experience and lists cash offers from $50K–$500K+, but independent customer feedback is not available to verify service quality or outcomes.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Last updated 2026-08-27