Blankenship Law vs. Law Office of Daniel L. Quigley: which fits loan modification & loss mitigation?
Both firms show up as options for homeowners in Indianapolis Metro searching for foreclosure help, but their track records point in different directions. Neither firm's review history centers on loan modification specifically, so the comparison below leans on the closest transferable evidence: how each firm negotiates with large institutions and how each handles clients under financial stress. See our methodology for how these scores are built.
The differences that matter
- Negotiation vs. litigation posture. Quigley's reviews describe direct negotiation against institutional delay tactics and lowball offers, which maps closely to lender workout talks, while Blankenship's track record is built on courtroom appearances and case dismissals.
- Handling drawn-out financial stress. Quigley's clients specifically cite settlements landing in months rather than years and relief from a slow, confusing process, a pattern that matters when a servicer is stalling a modification.
- Taking on difficult or rejected cases. Quigley is noted for accepting cases other attorneys had already dropped, a relevant signal for homeowners who've been denied a modification once already; Blankenship's reviews don't speak to this.
- Communication style under stress. Both firms get consistent praise for plain-English explanations and responsiveness, so neither has an edge on clarity or being reachable.
- Review volume and consistency. Blankenship holds a marginally higher rating on fewer reviews, while Quigley's praise is consistent across a larger review base, giving slightly more confidence in the pattern holding.
Side by side
- Google rating
- Blankenship Law Hamilton County Criminal Defense Lawyers: 5 (318 reviews)
- Law Office of Daniel L. Quigley: 4.9 (516 reviews)
- Services
- Blankenship Law Hamilton County Criminal Defense Lawyers: loan modification loss mitigation, legal services, foreclosure service
- Law Office of Daniel L. Quigley: loan modification loss mitigation, legal services, foreclosure service
- Evidence of loss mitigation work
- Blankenship Law Hamilton County Criminal Defense Lawyers: Not present in review data (focus is criminal defense)
- Law Office of Daniel L. Quigley: Not explicit, but negotiation-with-institution pattern from workers' comp cases is closely analogous
- Best-fit scenario
- Blankenship Law Hamilton County Criminal Defense Lawyers: Foreclosure has already escalated toward a court filing and you want a firm built around courtroom results
- Law Office of Daniel L. Quigley: You're trying to negotiate directly with a lender or servicer before or instead of going to court
- Verification
- Blankenship Law Hamilton County Criminal Defense Lawyers: Google-verified
- Law Office of Daniel L. Quigley: Google-verified
- Composite score
- Blankenship Law Hamilton County Criminal Defense Lawyers: 94
- Law Office of Daniel L. Quigley: 93
Within 3 points of each other, so treat them as effectively tied on overall quality. The choice below is about fit, not the score.
What reviewers say
Blankenship Law Hamilton County Criminal Defense Lawyers
Kevin Kelly, Eric Blankenship, and Alec Baker earned consistent praise for criminal defense work marked by quick responses, honest counsel, and courtroom results. Clients valued being treated with dignity through stressful proceedings and felt genuinely heard on what they wanted from their case outcome.
Law Office of Daniel L. Quigley
Workers' comp clients consistently praise Dan Quigley for cutting through insurance company delays and simplifying a stressful process. He answers calls reliably, negotiates strong settlements even when initial offers fall far short, and treats injured workers with genuine respect during their most vulnerable moments.
Quigley handles workplace injury claims across amputation, spinal cord injuries, head injuries, and shoulder damage, among others. Clients report settlements delivered within months, not years. His calm demeanor and plain-English explanations earned him trust from families facing financial crisis after work accidents.
Which should you pick?
Pick Blankenship Law Hamilton County Criminal Defense Lawyers if
- Your foreclosure situation is already moving toward a court date and you want attorneys with a strong record of court dismissals
- You value a firm known for showing up early and being direct about your odds, even when the news isn't good
- You want a smaller, tightly-reviewed practice (318 reviews) with a slightly higher raw rating
Pick Law Office of Daniel L. Quigley if
- You're trying to negotiate a modification or workout directly with a bank or servicer before things reach court
- You've already been denied once and need a firm with a track record of taking on cases others walked away from
- You want a firm with a larger, high-confidence review base and a documented pattern of faster resolutions
Verdict
The deciding factor here isn't the score, it's what each firm has actually shown it's good at. Quigley's reviews describe exactly the kind of institutional negotiation and stress relief that loss mitigation demands: pushing back on delay, improving bad initial offers, and taking on cases already rejected once. Blankenship has the stronger courtroom résumé, which matters more if your foreclosure is headed to a hearing rather than a negotiating table. For loan modification specifically, lean toward Quigley; for active foreclosure defense in court, Blankenship's track record carries more weight.
Ready to talk to an attorney?
Share what you're facing and get a case review from Foreclosure Attorney in Indianapolis Metro who can help.
Enquiries submitted through our quote and contact forms may be passed to partner providers who can perform the work. We may receive a referral fee for these introductions, but our rankings and scores are determined solely by our published method and are never influenced by referral fees.
FAQ
- Does either firm specialize in loan modification or loss mitigation?
- Neither firm's review history is centered on loan modification specifically. Blankenship's reviews focus on criminal defense outcomes, and Quigley's focus on workers' compensation negotiation, so the comparison relies on transferable skills rather than direct loan modification case evidence.
- Which firm is better for negotiating with a mortgage servicer?
- Quigley's reviews describe a consistent pattern of negotiating directly with institutions, overcoming lowball initial offers, and resolving cases faster, which is the closest match to what a loan modification negotiation requires.
- Which firm has more review volume to judge from?
- Quigley has 516 reviews at a 4.9 rating with high confidence in the score. Blankenship has 318 reviews at a 5.0 rating with medium confidence.
- Is one firm better if my case is already headed to a foreclosure hearing?
- Blankenship's reviews emphasize courtroom preparation, early appearances, and case dismissals, which is more relevant once a matter is in front of a judge rather than being negotiated directly with a lender.